当前位置 :首页>研究报道

德国某饮用水水库系统抗生素残留、耐药基因及耐药菌调查

发布者:抗性基因网 时间:2020-03-20 浏览量:618

     摘要

     2018年8月至2019年6月期间,通过液相色谱-串联质谱法、抗生素抗性基因(包括blaNDM、blaVIM、blaOXA-48、blaKPC、blaGIM、blaSME、,blaIMI,blaIMP,blaSPM,blaSIM,blaOXA-23,blaOXA-24,blaOXA-51,blaOXA-58,mcr)通过定性实时PCR和抗生素耐药菌(属于ESKAPE组(屎肠球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和肠杆菌ssp)。;根据培养方法,对碳青霉烯酶、头孢菌素和大肠杆菌素)和大肠杆菌]具有抗性,随后通过MALDI-TOF MS进行鉴定,并采用微量稀释进行敏感性试验。
      污水处理厂下游检测到克拉霉素(高达0.60μg/L)、磺胺甲恶唑(高达0.40μg/L)、甲氧苄啶(高达0.39μg/L)等大环内酯类抗生素残留。此外,除脱水红霉素(n=1,       综上所述,污水处理厂废水是抗生素残留(p=0.0000和p=0.0001)和抗生素耐药菌(p=0.0021和p=0.0060)的点源,因为它们的浓度在污水排入调查河流后显著增加。在这个缺乏临床、医院和集约畜牧业的特定集水区,在研究期间,在饮用水水库下游的河流中没有观察到污水处理厂的显著细菌或分析化学(抗生素残留)影响。此外,根据Bengtsson Palme和Larsson(2016年)的研究,由于测得的抗生素残留量未超过抗生素耐药性选择的预期无效应浓度,预计不会增加选择压力。


      Between August 2018 and June 2019, a river system in Germany that supplies a drinking water reservoir and is subject to the discharge from two sewage treatment plants was monitored for antibiotic residues via liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, antibiotic resistance genes (including blaNDM, blaVIM, blaOXA-48, blaKPC, blaGIM, blaSME, blaIMI, blaIMP, blaSPM, blaSIM, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24, blaOXA-51, blaOXA-58, mcr) via qualitative real-time PCR and antibiotic-resistant bacteria [belonging to the ESKAPE-group (Enterococcus faecium, Staphyhlococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter ssp.; with resistance against Carbapenemases, Cephalosporines and Colistin) and Escherichia coli] based on cultivation methods followed by a characterization via MALDI-TOF MS and susceptibility testing applying microdilution.

       Residues of macrolide antibiotics such as clarithromycin (up to 0.60 μg/L) and residues of sulfamethoxazole (up to 0.40 μg/L) and trimethoprim (up to 0.39 μg/L) were detected downstream of the sewage treatment plants. In addition, no antibiotic residues were detected upstream the respective sewage treatment plants, except for anhydroerythromycin (n = 1, blaOXA-58 was found in 6, and mcr in one water sample throughout the whole sample period. No MRSA, extensively drug-resistant or pan-resistant bacteria, according to Magiorakos et al. (2011), could be isolated. In contrast, multidrug-resistant bacteria, especially E. coli and Enterococcus faecium were found.

       In conclusion, sewage treatment plant effluents are point sources for antibiotic residues (p = 0.0000 and p = 0.0001) and antibiotic-resistant bacteria (p = 0.0021 and p = 0.0060) since their concentrations increased significantly after the discharge of treated wastewater into the investigated rivers. In this specific catchment area, which lacked clinical, hospitals, and intensive livestock farming, no significant bacterial or analyzed chemical (antibiotic residues) influences of the sewage treatment plants were observed in the river downstream of the drinking water reservoir during the study. Furthermore, no increased selection pressure could be expected as no measured antibiotic residues exceeded the predicted no effect concentration for antibiotic resistance selection, according to Bengtsson-Palme and Larsson (2016).

      https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1438463919309162